Tag Archives: japan

Bizzare Search Terms: 2011 Edition

28 Jun

So now that I’m back in the fold I’ve been watching some of the things that random people search for that bring them to State of Affairs.  A while back, my former partner-in-crime Alex James wrote about this very same topic.  I’ve been looking through the archives and there’s some even stranger stuff, 2 years later.

Continue reading

3 Bizarre Energy Technologies That Are Also Awesome (SOA Post 200!)

3 Sep

Today is a big day, my dear readers.  You’ve been with me through trials and tribulations aplenty over the last year and a bit: together we’ve taken on just about every major cultural institution that warrants my considerable attention, and I love you all dearly for it.  Which is why I’m proud to inform you that today marks State of Affairs’ 200th official post.  You may now commence celebration.

Continue reading

Top 5 Uses for Nuclear Energy That Would Be Awesome If They Were Real

19 Mar

Yeah yeah, I know. Nuclear energy is way more complicated than Hollywood would have us believe. According to movies and the Department of Homeland Security, nuclear energy can be used to do just about anything, and your average ten year-old is fully capable of building one of those nifty Soviet-era suitcase nukes out of nothing more than a smidge of plutonium, a Meccano set and an Easy-Bake Oven.

Continue reading

Breaking Wind

6 Jul

Oh, Monday. How I love and loathe thee. On the one hand it’s nice to start fresh after a weekend of wanton debauchery and unexplainable injuries; it’s a reminder that the real world continues to spin even when I go out of my way to remove myself from the day-to-day for a while. It’s necessary for a guy like me to gain a little perspective by forcefully realigning my world view by getting out into the bigger universe and subjecting myself to a little good old-fashioned visceral experience.

visceral experience

Continue reading

The End of an Era

2 Jun


Well, it finally happened. Not even the Great Bailout of 2009 could save that lumbering dinosaur we’ve known and hated as the General Motors Corporation. This morning it was announced that the 100 year-old automotive manufacturing company filed for bankruptcy – the third-largest filing in U.S. history, and definitely the biggest in the history of American manufacturing. That’s all folks: the Dow Jones no longer lists GM shares, and the New York Stock Exchange has delisted the stocks as “no longer suitable for listing”. It’s closing time – you don’t have to go home, but apparently you can’t stay here.

I’m not going to rehash what we already know from the news coverage from the last six months, but I will say this is a very gutsy move on the part of the Obama administration. For those of us not in the know, contingent upon the bankruptcy filing, President Obama is providing USD $30 billion to “restructure” General Motors. Basically what’s going to happen is the company will be divided into two sections: “Old GM” which will constitute the dead weight that will eventually be cut up and liquidated, and “New GM” which ostensibly will become a much more streamlined, environmentally-conscious organization, 60% of the stakes in which will be owned by the federal government of the United States. The UAW will have a 17.5% stake, the Canadian federal government will take 12%, and GM bondholders will be left with 10%. Obama’s administration is hoping that such a restructure will allow General Motors to emerge as a viable competitor to successful automotive companies like Honda, Toyota, Nissan and Hyundai – you know, the companies that make good cars and aren’t German.

I’m not a union man myself, but my heart goes out to the 92,000 employees and the half-a-million retirees GM once employed and sheltered: in these trying economic times I’m sure this is not welcome news to those men and women or their families. With any luck we’ll see some good come out of this mess for those folks, but Obama’s rhetoric on what exactly is going to happen to GM has been pretty vague:

“I am absolutely confident that if well-managed, a new GM will emerge that can…out-compete automakers around the world and that can once again be an integral part of America’s economic future.”

Great. What exactly does that mean? Clearly, going back to the “old” way of doing things isn’t going to cut it anymore. GM has routinely been outpaced by more fuel-efficient vehicles designed primarily by East Asian and German interests; with this new direction, the days of the Hummer are numbered – I hope.

A more interesting question is this: what could the U.S. government do with thirty billion dollars to “restructure” an auto manufacturer? Do they want to throw good money after bad and keep traipsing down the same old garden path that inevitably ends at the mouth of an open well, at the bottom of which the creepy ghost girl from “The Ring” lies waiting to eat our souls? Or could we potentially go a (gasp) new and innovative route?

As much as I’m not a union man, I’m also not a big fan of Michael Moore. After “Bowling for Columbine” and “Sicko”, I sort of started to lose patience with his patent disregard for things like, oh, I don’t know, sources. But I think, in his recent blog post on this issue, he really nailed some fantastic ways of spending all that extra dough the Obama government wants to sling GM’s way, particularly his assertion that the U.S. should really have a country-wide light rail service like they do in Japan. I mean, New York to L.A. in 17 hours? Green? Who wouldn’t want that?

The next few weeks are going to be very telling. In my estimation we’re going to see the results of two major gambits: the Obama administration’s faith in putting a huge chunk of change aside to rebuild GM, and the American people’s faith in the Obama government.