Short Of Breath: Global Warming Means Less Wind

27 Jul

So apparently Mother Earth is finding herself short of breath these days. Like a pack-a-day smoker, she wakes up in the morning hawking gooey brown mucous into a well-worn handkerchief, stretches her aching ribcage as she stumbles out of her nicotine-yellowed sheets and reaches for the pack of Marlboro Lights she keeps on her bedside table to start the process all over again.

mother nature smoking

You’re welcome for that exceptionally unpleasant image, by the way. Grossing you people out is a source of considerable pride for me.

gross ewan mcgregor

If you run the preceding paragraph through the Alex-James-Metaphor-to-Ordinary-English decoder, you’ll find that scientists are starting to have pretty serious concerns that the average wind speed on earth is steadily declining – likely as a result of global warming.

stranded sailboat

Scientists are still fighting out the details of this new development, which they aren’t entirely sure is accurate yet, but the prospects don’t look good. According to new studies, there’s been a dramatic decrease in high-wind days, especially in the mid-western United States. States like Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Kansas, Virginia, Louisiana, Georgia, northern Maine and western Montana are all showing significant drops in wind-heavy periods over the last two decades or so.

Eugene Takle, professor of atmospheric science at Iowa State University, suggests the drop in wind speeds is likely a result of an increased trend in global warming across the world. Force of wind (which, at its core, is just a measurement of air particles moving around) is the result of changing atmospheric pressure, itself a result of warm and cold air fronts colliding. As the North and South poles heat up thanks to global warming, the difference in temperature between the Poles and the Equator diminishes, equaling declining disparity in barometric pressure (how’s that for alliteration?) – which itself equals, in layman’s terms, less wind.

united states no wind

Why is this an issue? I’m sure people in Kansas or Chicago probably won’t mind not getting blown off their feet three hundred days out of the year, and not too many people use sailboats as their primary mode of transportation anymore, so who cares?

Well, wind power activists, for one.

wind farm not working

The power of irony never ceases to paradoxically amuse and depress me. I’ve written on the subject of wind power before, and I’ve argued pretty hard against it being a viable solution to the energy crisis. But at least the big green hearts of those well-meaning environmentalists are in the right place – they’re trying to effect positive change in the world, despite being a little backward in their understanding of efficient power sources (there are much better alternatives they haven’t really considered). It’s devastatingly ironic, therefore, that the very problem they’re trying to combat is actually curtailing their efforts to fix it.

damned if you do

Like I said in the previous post, wind power is a really nice idea. I like it. I think it’s nifty. But clearly if this study proves to be grounded in empirical fact, it’s a dead end. If global warming is actually having a negative effect on the planet’s ability to generate a decent breeze, then the push towards wind power is putting the cart in front of the horse. Instead of lessening our dependence on fossil fuels using alternate energy sources, we should first work on limiting the destructive effects our current energy sources have on the environment in order to curb global warming. Only then we can start figuring out how to harness atmospheric pressure to power our day-to-day lives.

Let’s get on it before we have to put Mama Nature on a ventilator.

earth lungs

4 Responses to “Short Of Breath: Global Warming Means Less Wind”

  1. livinglime July 27, 2009 at 4:28 PM #

    uh, why can’t we do both? I’m all for making what we have work better, but by the time we run out of our current sources of energy, it will be too late to invest in alternatives. Besides, does anyone REALLY think that things like “clean” coal are going to solve our problems?

  2. Dead Cat on Bathurst July 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM #

    As long as attempts are made at improving the way things are done now AS WELL AS implementing safer and healthier alternatives that’s the main thing. We wont get anywhere unless we’re taking steps in the proper direction.

    Less talk, more action.

  3. Shayla July 28, 2009 at 10:30 AM #

    What’s the word for that syndrome where you’ve read too much terrifying bad environmental news and now every time you hear another piece you get heart palpitations and a forceful urge to pry the tiny windows of your tenth-floor office building open and jump out? Anyway, whatever that’s called, I think I have it.

    But yes, I agree with both of the comments above me.


  1. Obama Wins Peace Prize: World Replies WTF? « State of Affairs - October 13, 2009

    […] a pretty liberal guy: I’m an active supporter of gay rights, women’s rights and the drive towards sustainable energy. I was a major critic of the previous US administration under George Bush and I’ve spoken out […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: